Forum : The word "locavore"
You must be logged in to post Login Register

Search 
Search Forums:


 




The word “locavore”

UserPost

11:40 am
August 2, 2008


Michael Morowitz

Admin

Chicago, IL

posts 40

1

As I wrote about in the “welcome” page to the site, I'm not a huge fan of the word locavore.  My biggest problem is that it feels like it's categorizing people who eat locally alongside vegans and raw-foodists.  Eating locally is not a completist endeavor, and I don't think it should be treated as such.  An oversimplifying label seems misplaced here.

I've heard from a couple other people who disagree.  So, let's have it out in public. What do you think?

Michael Morowitz, Editor in Chief, The Local Beet

2:34 am
August 3, 2008


dhammond

Member

posts 4

2

Michael, are you objecting to any label? If you are, then no substitute term will do, either.

I happen to like “locavore” because it sounds kind of funny and seems not to take itself too seriously, as does “vegan” and “gourmet.”

I'm also not sure that it suggests the exclusivity that you believe it does. I have called myself a “carnivore,” but that doesn't mean I eat only meat.

7:01 am
August 3, 2008


Michael Morowitz

Admin

Chicago, IL

posts 40

3

I'm not objecting to any label, and in the sense of the “carnivore” word it makes sense.

But, I do think that “big media” uses it to denote exclusivity in ones diet. Every time I see the word used, it's in regard to some couple trying to eat only within x miles of their home.  When “locavore” was coined a few years back, the women who coined it also declared it to be a movement of eating only local.

I suppose my objection to the word is more symbolic. A label is fine, but I want to stand against zealotry and in favor of small gains.

The perfect is the enemy of the good.

Best,

Michael

Michael Morowitz, Editor in Chief, The Local Beet

9:08 am
August 3, 2008


rgardner

Moderator

posts 49

4

Put me down in favor of liking the word locavore (which seems to have won the competition over its more exact but more lettered rival, localvore).  I agree with the Editor-in-Chief that we do not want to be exclusive, limiting or just plain hard.  This is not a movement for zealots or ascetics.  Still, we need a word to suit us and locavore is as good as any.

Firstly, I am un-persuaded that locavore has been captured by the most extreme of our brethren.  It's earliest carriers may have had an exact definition in their minds when they coined the word, i.e., if you do not confound to the rules, say 100 miles, you are not a locavore, but I have found in the blogs and disscussions on the Internet nary a voice for such extremism.  If you peruse the posts at the Eat Local Challenge Blog especially the earliest ones, when we were all getting started, you find pretty much everyone (I only say pretty much as I have not re-read all the earliest posts and there may be someone out there on the edge) makes their definition of eating local fuzzy.  Secondly, there is no Academie Francaise policing our words.  We the users of the term can make it anything we want it to be.  If the great majority of people, with less harsh ideas of local in their diet want to be locavores, well, let's make it happen.

I like locavore because it already stands for so much.  It stands mostly for knowing about your food, calling it local is just another way of saying you care about where you food comes from.  Caring that it comes from farmers and producers you know, farmer's and producers you trust, and farmers and producers that you expect to be good before you even dig in.  I had an outstanding locavore dinner the other night at L'Etoilei n Madison that went from the effete micro greens to the heft of aged sirloin with stops along the way for nuts and berries as well as hunks of pork.  It all fit in to the locavore diet.

Sure, let's be on guard against those who want to make our word mean something we are not.  We can reject any movement that includes principles we care not to live.  We can be what we want, locavores.

Search 

About the The Local Beet: Chicago forum

Most Users Ever Online:

25


Currently Online:

4 Guests

Forum Stats:

Groups: 1

Forums: 4

Topics: 65

Posts: 160

Membership:

There are 175 Members

There has been 1 Guest

There is 1 Admin

There are 2 Moderators

Top Posters:

ChicagoCornhole – 21

kennyz – 19

helenps – 6

mbstietenroth – 5

dhammond – 4

ghollander – 4

Administrators: Michael Morowitz (40 Posts)

Moderators: mgraham (9 Posts), rgardner (49 Posts)